I'm not much of a gamer, mostly because I dislike how the time spent playing a MMO or FPS usually done in the sitting position. If there could be a way to create a MMO that also encouraged exercise in an immersive environment I could be hooked. I imagine a MMO on the scale of World of Warcraft or several times bigger that could be stretched over reality through google glass assisted augmentation.
My experience with MMO's is rather limited, I spent a summer playing WOW and enjoyed it greatly. The reason I stopped was because of how greatly it limited me to do other things. It's hard to run around outside and play with your dog while playing a game like wow.
From what I'm seeing in the Beta testing of google glass it looks like there is potential to bring the convalescence of those ideas to fruition. How cool would that be!
Monday, May 6, 2013
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Why has no one done this yet?
Quadcopter food delivery.
The concept seems too simple once you put it together, to the point where I don't understand why it hasn't already been done. As in a previous post where I discuss the merits of quadrotor flying robots we have machines capable of physically accomplishing the task, we have programming and flight control technologies to get the bots from point A to point B, and a smart phone provides all the communication infrastructure that could ever be necessary to coordinate movement.
Lets walk through how the process would look from the point of view of a person hungry for pizza. Bob is a average guy living in a house, Bob wants pizza to eat while he watches the game, so Bob calls up the local pizza joint and orders a pizza. The pizza joint takes the order and being for delivery accepts Bob's information to place the order, his name, phone number, address, and credit card info for payment. The pizza joint now has all the information they need to autonomously deliver the pizza as soon as it's out of the oven. At the end of the call the person taking the order asks if front yard delivery or backyard delivery would work better for him, this question is informed by the order taker having input Bob's address into a google maps program that pulls up a location for his address, and providing an overhead visual of the residence, Bob says his preference is the back yard (because the backyard is closer to the couch)
The order is complete and the pizza making team start making Bob's pizza. The digital order ticket is ready and corresponds to the pizza moving through the oven. As soon as the pizza is done cooking and in the box the receipt is printed out and taped onto the top of the box, (the same process that almost every pizza chain uses). An employee takes a few steps outside to where the "delivery coordinator"(the only employee needed to conduct all deliveries for a food delivery business) is setup. The employee carrying the pizza walks up to the delivery bot next in the que, uses the barcode reader function built into the smart phone which is attached to the bot, to inform the bot which order it is delivering. The employee then places the pizza into the pizza container box just like the ones that delivery drivers use to keep the pizza hot, and press a "ready" button on the top of the delivery bot to inform the bot that it can now start the delivery process.
As soon as the "ready" button is pressed the delivery bot becomes autonomous. First the bot powers up all systems while still attached to the charging station and does a quick functions check. Ensuring all the rotors are providing correct maximum thrust, the batteries have correct capacity, the smartphone brain has no faults in it's subsystems or it's ability to communicate. When all the checks are complete the bot will check it's surroundings for anything impeding it's ascension, if none are found the delivery bot will immediately rocket skywards to a preplanned altitude of 400 feet at an inclination so as to establish buffer room from the incoming and outgoing delivery bots.
Although the delivery bot will be following a very specific set of flight plans for each delivery, it will not appear as such to the person observing. The delivery bot will appear to rocket off the ground, flying high into the sky then banking off into the distance. This is because as soon as the bot reaches its first planned flight reference point it will begin it's progress to the second. The second flight reference point will be established as 400 feet directly above the location selected in the order process as the delivery location. Once the delivery bot arrives at the second flight reference point it will do three things simultaneously, start a "FaceTime" video call back to the restaurant, and begin descending to a height of 40 feet and begin a cell phone call to Bob who ordered the pizza. The bot will maintain a hover at 40 feet until the "delivery coordinator" is able to observe the process to oversee the delivery bot's actions. This is important because until we have true artificial intelligence it will be important for the last few feet to be carefully watched for any unexpected hazard.
Bob hears his phone ringing and picks it up, getting an automated message that the delivery bot is at his house ready to deliver his pizza, Bob walks out his back door and sees the bot hovering above his backyard. The delivery coordinator back at the store, seeing that Bob is ready to receive his pizza presses the "deliver" button on his controls. The delivery bot now lowers the pizza warming box from its main body so the food box is several feet lower than the rotor body, and using a laser range finder comes to a hover so that the box is exactly at the right height for a person to retrieve pizza. The smart phone that initiated a "FaceTime" call earlier is with the box. The delivery coordinator sees Bob and greats him, thanking him for his order and explaining his pizza is ready for him to take it. Bob sees his pizza presented to him and slides it out of the warming box. The delivery coordinator presses the "delivery complete" button and the delivery bot immediately begins ascending reeling the pizza warming box in as it rises.
| www.cam-and-carrier.com |
I agree that it seems like there are a lot of moving pieces to this idea. What is important to keep in mind is how mature these systems are, and how readily they will work together. Nothing in this idea would require new technology, components would include an off the shelf quad or hexa copter (depending on delivery capacity needed) and a smart phone (doesn't matter what kind, but the same functions of an iPhone5) then you would need a programmer to write the purpose built application to run on the phone that would execute the functions. There would be some digital infrastructure needed at hub to control the fleet of delivery bots but once again all very simple challenges.
The beautiful elegant element to the whole idea is that the Bob character does nothing different, and gets his pizza faster. All the complexity is procedurally executed by the technology and the people can spend more time doing people things, like asking if everything looks correct when Bob opens the lid and finds
Just imagine if you added a couple LED's to the quad copter and maybe a speaker for sound effects, you would have every kid in america begging their parents to "order food from that place that delivers with helicopters" just so they could see the spectacle.
Saturday, December 15, 2012
Could this happen faster than any of us thought?
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Heads up ski goggles
Monday, November 19, 2012
Laundry Robot part 2
As I discussed in an earlier post household robots will herald a revolution in the way we live. Robotic household servants will become commonplace and allow people to live without regard for simple daily tasks.
Above is a great example of a robot which has been programmed to learn form humans how to accomplish a variety of tasks. With no training the people participating in the study were able to teach the robot how to fold a towel or open a bottle of pills. The mechanical usefulness of robots such as this far exceeds our ability to program software to make them autonomously capable of the broad range of things we would like it to do. Learning software will give us the ability to on the fly teach a robot a new task, and then add it to it's catalogue.
Robot, please have my laundry cleaned and folded when I wake up.
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Smart wristbands
Our technology is growing closer to us, we haven't figured out how to bring components inside our bodies yet however our ability to seamlessly adorn ourselves with all sorts of technology is growing. A few companies have recently released wristbands that have some measure of health monitoring. Nike has their FuelBand and Jawbone has recently come out with their Up. Both systems are great technology for a word on comparing the two heres a review from the new york times.
These gadgets are a great step in the right direction: unobtrusive pieces of tech that provide useful data to us. A recent discovery has revealed an interesting possibility for human sensors. There is a part of the inner ear where our bodies create a natural battery. Work by researchers at MIT have shown on guinea pigs that electrical energy can be directly harvested from the inner ear without damaging the ear's function. This discovery could overcome the stumbling block of most electronics that are designed to be placed inside the body, a power source. Pace makers could charge off the ear, we could implant sensors like the FuelBand and Up inside our bodies and power them off our natural systems.
Imagine your body telling you if your calorie excess or deficient for the day.
One step closer to inmortality
Average life expectancy has steadily been increasing over the last century. In 1912, hundred years ago it was about 50 years where today life expectancy is close to 80 years. If you plot this chart on a graph you get a nice trend line that has generally plotted upward consistently. However since it's life span that we're interested in right now and not 100 years ago there is a much more pertinent way to look at the data. Instead to taking the raw average for every year and simply plotting it, take the difference in life expectancy between years and show how many days of life expectancy were added each year. The punchline is that if the data ever shows that we have added 365 days of life expectancy in the course of a year we have effectively built enough road so we'll never crash, thus immortality.
| http://www.uni-kiel.de |
Researchers at Kiel University in Germany have brought us another step closer to reaching the goal of unlimited life extension, with their work on the Hydra. A Hydra is a genus of tiny animals with bodies about 10mm long. What makes Hydras a source of curiosity in the first place is the fact that they reproduce by growing a bud which becomes a new Hydra. When the researchers at the Kiel University started to investigate how the hydra could maintain it's immortality they found that there was a very active gene "FoxO" which is responsible for allowing the production of stem cells. Where the story gets very interesting is that this same gene is found in humans except the FoxO gene in human bodies gradually becomes less and less active over out lives. We are already finding ways to correct our DNA and reprogram our genetic code, when we find the switch to keep the FoxO gene perpetually switched on we could very likely find a source of lengthening our life spans dramatically. In a previous post: dna-candy-shop I reviewed the state of the art therapies that give us the ability to cut and past new DNA into our genetic code throughout all the cells in our bodies. When we understand the system that controls gene expression a little better it would be easy for us to add a genetic patch to our DNA that allows us to maintain active FoxO genes.
The pessimistic response to life extension is that it's a selfish desire and that people should be comfortable embracing the "natural" process of aging and then death. My question is "whats natural about aging and death?" We assume that these things are natural because it is all that we are accustomed to and have yet to see a better model. My favorite way to take someone through the immortality thought experiment is to ask them how they would feel if they could live to 180, the responses I often get are "old, tired, exhausted, done". Then I add more to the scenario, "what if when you turned 180 you felt just as young and exuberant as you did when you were 24, just as full of life, passion, lust, desire, energy, excitement and wonder" the responses change, "hmmm, that wouldn't be so bad". In my experience many of our fears about living longer are based on fears that are fueled by two things, one our lack of experience so it's unknown and we always fear what we don't know, and two a failure of imagination.
This is not to say that the ability to allow people to live twice or three times as long as we do know won't bring challenges, but me, I'd much rather meet those challenges head on and courageously jump into the void than choose the cowardly option of sticking to what we know.
The pessimistic response to life extension is that it's a selfish desire and that people should be comfortable embracing the "natural" process of aging and then death. My question is "whats natural about aging and death?" We assume that these things are natural because it is all that we are accustomed to and have yet to see a better model. My favorite way to take someone through the immortality thought experiment is to ask them how they would feel if they could live to 180, the responses I often get are "old, tired, exhausted, done". Then I add more to the scenario, "what if when you turned 180 you felt just as young and exuberant as you did when you were 24, just as full of life, passion, lust, desire, energy, excitement and wonder" the responses change, "hmmm, that wouldn't be so bad". In my experience many of our fears about living longer are based on fears that are fueled by two things, one our lack of experience so it's unknown and we always fear what we don't know, and two a failure of imagination.
This is not to say that the ability to allow people to live twice or three times as long as we do know won't bring challenges, but me, I'd much rather meet those challenges head on and courageously jump into the void than choose the cowardly option of sticking to what we know.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)